Salesforce CRM's REST API allows for inserting up to 200 records into Salesforce using just a single API call, a considerable time- and cost-savings over inserting records one-by-one. I've updated my Java Salesforce client to be able to make such calls. Some notes about this process:
This multiple insertion process is distinct from Salesforce's Bulk API, an asynchronous method that relies on CSV files that is suggested for data sets of over 2000 records where immediate responses are not necessary.
This process is just for record insertions. For other CRUD actions, Salesforce's Composite API can be used, albeit with lower limits (25 requests per query).
Salesforce provides a multi-insert example showing the request and successful (201 Created) response JSON, but is missing the format of error messages specific to these types of calls. I'm providing below the format of the error responses determined while updating the Java client. Given a snippet of the SF example's request body:
{ "records" :[{ "attributes" : {"type" : "Account", "referenceId" : "ref1"}, "name" : "SampleAccount1", "phone" : "1111111111", "website" : "www.salesforce.com", "numberOfEmployees" : "100", "industry" : "Banking" },{ "attributes" : {"type" : "Account", "referenceId" : "ref2"}, "name" : "SampleAccount2", "phone" : "2222222222", "website" : "www.salesforce2.com", "numberOfEmployees" : "250", "industry" : "Banking" },... ] }
Each item to be inserted needs an attributes
metadata property, specifying the type
and a referenceId
, the latter of which can be anything but must be unique for each item in the insertion. The reference IDs are used in the response for either providing the Salesforce IDs for successful insertions, or in referring to any errors with that particular record. The attribute type
field seems redundant, as the API call made already specifies the type being inserted, but it is nonetheless required for these types of calls.
Generic error response (403) if any reference IDs are missing:
[ { "message": "Include a reference ID for each record in the request.", "errorCode": "INVALID_INPUT" } ]
Above message will be uncommon so long as the request has referenceIds for every record provided. The more common 400 Bad Request response can occur due to missing attribute types, duplicate reference IDs, as well as validation failures, missing required fields, etc. For 400s, the response body will list the problem records by the referenceId provided in the request, example:
{ "hasErrors": true, "results": [ { "referenceId": "ref3", "errors": [ { "statusCode": "INVALID_INPUT", "message": "Duplicate ReferenceId provided in the request.", "fields": [] } ] }, { "referenceId": "ref8", "errors": [ { "statusCode": "INVALID_INPUT", "message": "Include an entity type for each record in the request.", "fields": [] } ] } ] }
What is important to note with multiple record insertion is that, if there are any reported problems with any of the items being inserted, none of the records in the request will be inserted (all-or-nothing). One way to handle failures is to make a second request of the same records minus those reported as failures in the prior response (matching on referenceId), to at least get those records inserted. The failed records can instead be logged and analyzed to see what to do with them.
As for making these calls using the Salesforce Client, an included integration test shows the process for inserting multiple rows with one call, and also how to trap and read any 400 exceptions that may occur. The code is fairly the same regardless of which objects are being inserted, however each type of object being inserted will need a MultipleEntityRecord subclass (similar to here for the integration test). The MultipleEntityRecord base class stores the required type
and referenceId
attributes, while the subclass is to store the fields specific to the object being inserted.
Posted by Glen Mazza in Salesforce CRM at 02:00AM Nov 14, 2022 | Tags: salesforce salesforce-crm | Comments[0]